Players

Cam Biederman 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	14	15	16	6

Season 14 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
268 39th	.327 195th	24 76th	90 70th	56 90th

Career Honors

S142nd All-SEC

S162nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	8	29	.172	5	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.39
3	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	16	.188	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.79
4	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	8	26	.038	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	6.45
5	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	7	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.28
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	13	.000	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.61
11	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	15	.467	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.36
14	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	16	.563	3	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.40
15	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	7	34	.382	7	4	1	0.80	19	.947	2	0.40	2	1.000	25.5	8.25
17	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	19	6.33	4	29	.517	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	1	0.33	1	1.000	20.5	8.91
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	2	25	.640	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.40
21	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	5	29	.379	6	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.83
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	2	22	.636	5	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.77
25	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	27	.185	6	2	1	0.50	14	.929	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	6.52
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	9	34	.118	10	2	3	0.50	19	.842	1	0.25	2	.500	16.0	6.07
29	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	12	.667	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.09
33	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	10	25	.000	9	1	2	0.33	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	7.78
34	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	26	5.20	10	46	.348	5	2	1	0.40	14	.929	.	.	.	.	32.0	9.17
36	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	19	6.33	9	35	.286	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.23
39	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	7	31	.387	9	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	21.5	8.82
41	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	25	.440	10	2	2	0.50	18	.889	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.39
Total		71	268	3.77	105	499	.327	113	24	27	0.34	262	.897	4	0.06	8	.500	321.0	7.08

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	5	1.00	16	2.22	32	2	.938	14.5	5.39
3	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	16	2.00	36	4	.889	9.0	3.79
4	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	8	2.13	16	1	.938	11.0	6.45
5	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	14	2.21	24	3	.875	8.0	4.28
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	2.21	14	0	1.000	6.0	3.61
11	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	2	2.33	7	2.33	9	2.57	14	0	1.000	13.5	8.36
14	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	4	1.82	11	1	.909	10.5	5.40
15	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	10	2.00	13	2.18	28	0	1.000	25.5	8.25
17	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	14	2.60	20	0	1.000	20.5	8.91
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	8	2.67	5	2.09	11	0	1.000	18.5	8.40
21	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	5	1.82	17	2	.882	19.0	7.83
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	11	2.31	16	2	.875	18.0	8.77
25	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	4	1.00	8	2.10	21	1	.952	16.5	6.52
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	5	1.87	15	1	.933	16.0	6.07
29	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	5	2.57	7	0	1.000	8.5	7.09
33	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	6	2.13	15	1	.933	13.0	7.78
34	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	1	1.60	7	1.40	14	2.33	27	1	.963	32.0	9.17
36	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	14	2.22	27	3	.889	19.5	8.23
39	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	21	2.44	32	2	.938	21.5	8.82
41	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	14	2.45	20	1	.950	20.0	8.39
Total		71	2	54	56	10	0.79	90	1.27	208	2.22	403	25	.938	321.0	7.08