Players

Career Honors

S15MVP BIG-EAST1st All-BIG-EAST

S162nd All-BIG-EAST

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	5	.000	7	3	3	0.75	16	.813	35	8.75	83	.422	6.5	5.80
2	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	1	.000	2	0	6	0.00	12	.500	42	8.40	90	.467	4.0	4.34
6	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	6	2	1	0.50	12	.917	31	7.75	87	.356	6.0	4.68
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	34	11.33	59	.576	0.5	6.24
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	25	8.33	62	.403	1.0	3.44
10	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	3	1	1	0.25	9	.889	33	8.25	79	.418	3.0	3.54
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	4	.000	6	0	1	0.00	18	.944	64	12.80	93	.688	2.5	8.22
15	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	9	.333	8	2	2	0.40	17	.882	53	10.60	102	.520	7.0	6.52
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	11	.000	6	1	1	0.20	16	.938	53	10.60	101	.525	4.0	6.04
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	2	0	4	0.00	8	.500	42	14.00	60	.700	2.0	8.87
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	35	11.67	53	.660	1.5	7.98
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	26	8.67	55	.473	1.5	4.18
26	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	5	.000	9	0	3	0.00	19	.842	52	13.00	89	.584	2.0	9.52
29	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	3	.333	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	34	11.33	79	.430	4.0	7.06
30	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	5	-.200	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	29	9.67	62	.468	1.5	4.48
34	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	13	3	1	0.75	21	.952	51	12.75	83	.614	6.5	9.22
40	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	5	.600	11	4	1	0.80	24	.958	55	11.00	105	.524	7.5	6.37
44	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	8	0	2	0.00	16	.875	38	12.67	67	.567	1.0	8.10
Total		69	21	0.30	7	78	.179	104	17	35	0.25	250	.860	732	10.61	1409	.520	62.0	6.37

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.80
2	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.34
6	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.68
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	6.24
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.44
10	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.54
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.22
15	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.52
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	2	0.60	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.04
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.87
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.98
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.18
26	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	9.52
29	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.06
30	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.48
34	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	9.22
40	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.37
44	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.10
Total		69	6	36	42	3	0.61	82	1.19	.	.	.	.	.	62.0	6.37