Players

Evan Ames 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	12	15	17

Season 16 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
970 15th	34 322nd	54 2nd	71 146th	31 249th

Career Honors

S15MVP BIG-EAST1st All-BIG-EAST

S162nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 16)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	2	2	1	0.67	11	.909	44	14.67	68	.647	3.5	8.22
2	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	4	2	1	0.67	13	.923	23	7.67	66	.348	8.0	5.48
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	11	1	1	0.33	17	.941	35	11.67	50	.700	2.0	7.86
5	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	9	.000	8	3	1	0.75	20	.950	43	10.75	81	.531	6.0	6.80
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	4	1	3	0.20	17	.824	45	9.00	87	.517	4.0	4.00
8	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	5	.000	12	3	0	0.60	26	1.000	64	12.80	103	.621	4.5	7.94
10	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	8	.375	10	1	0	0.25	21	1.000	49	12.25	83	.590	6.5	9.19
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	5	1	3	0.33	14	.786	35	11.67	60	.583	2.5	6.82
13	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	6	2	2	0.67	15	.867	36	12.00	49	.735	3.5	7.08
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	35	11.67	57	.614	3.0	7.47
18	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	15	5	4	1.67	22	.818	39	13.00	65	.600	6.5	9.17
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	10	3	2	1.00	16	.875	38	12.67	50	.760	6.5	9.08
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	9	.000	12	4	2	1.33	21	.905	46	15.33	70	.657	5.0	8.75
23	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	1	1.000	9	3	3	0.75	21	.857	58	14.50	79	.734	4.5	8.92
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	8	.250	4	2	1	0.67	12	.917	24	8.00	55	.436	6.0	4.49
27	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	5	.800	17	6	4	1.20	32	.875	66	13.20	96	.688	11.0	9.12
29	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	8	1	4	0.33	17	.765	47	15.67	55	.855	4.0	9.36
32	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	8	.000	11	3	4	0.75	23	.826	51	12.75	92	.554	3.5	8.14
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	3	2	1	0.67	12	.917	40	13.33	62	.645	2.0	6.88
35	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	7	.000	9	3	3	0.75	21	.857	51	12.75	81	.630	5.0	8.90
39	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	12	4	2	1.33	18	.889	44	14.67	62	.710	4.0	9.11
44	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	3	.000	5	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	57	14.25	89	.640	3.0	8.46
Total		78	34	0.44	9	104	.240	182	54	44	0.69	399	.890	970	12.44	1560	.622	104.5	7.78

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 16)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.22
2	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.48
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.86
5	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.80
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.00
8	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.94
10	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	9.19
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.82
13	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.08
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.47
18	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	9.17
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	9.08
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.75
23	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.92
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.49
27	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.12
29	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.36
32	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.14
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.88
35	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.90
39	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.11
44	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.46
Total		78	2	29	31	3	0.40	71	0.91	.	.	.	.	.	104.5	7.78