Players

Luis Campos 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	18	14	14	15	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	28	.214	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	4.35
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	10	.400	9	2	2	0.67	14	.857	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.5	4.54
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	18	.333	5	3	1	1.00	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.0	5.55
6	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	14	-.071	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.08
11	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	27	.333	1	1	2	0.33	9	.778	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.0	7.07
13	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	17	-.118	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.0	3.59
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	7	29	.207	6	1	4	0.20	20	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	7.26
17	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	0	23	.783	4	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	1	0.33	2	.500	19.5	8.71
19	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	20	.300	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	6.19
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	18	.222	5	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	6.24
25	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	34	.500	9	2	4	0.40	24	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	22.5	8.46
26	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	31	.452	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.60
29	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	12	.167	7	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.87
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	15	.467	4	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.67
34	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	25	.240	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.85
41	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	25	.400	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.92
Total		54	162	3.00	50	346	.324	71	14	26	0.26	189	.862	6	0.11	11	.545	198.0	6.12

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	12	1.97	30	4	.867	9.5	4.35
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	4	2.00	10	0	1.000	7.5	4.54
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	8	2.31	13	1	.923	11.0	5.55
6	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	1	8	9	0	3.00	2	0.67	3	1.77	13	1	.923	8.0	3.08
11	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	7	2.31	13	0	1.000	14.0	7.07
13	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.23	13	1	.923	4.0	3.59
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	8	1.60	18	2.78	23	0	1.000	17.0	7.26
17	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	4	2.22	9	0	1.000	19.5	8.71
19	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	6	2.00	5	2.00	12	1	.917	10.5	6.19
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	13	2.38	24	0	1.000	9.5	6.24
25	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	14	2.50	20	0	1.000	22.5	8.46
26	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	9	2.14	14	2	.857	18.5	7.60
29	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	2.07	14	0	1.000	6.0	3.87
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	6	2.17	12	1	.917	12.5	6.67
34	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	2.60	15	0	1.000	11.0	6.85
41	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	6	2.18	11	1	.909	17.0	7.92
Total		54	5	34	39	7	0.72	55	1.02	130	2.25	246	12	.951	198.0	6.12