Players

Session 13 orders deadline in 7 hours and 57 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Sunday, May 3rd, 2026 - 10:02:47 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Logan Shaffmaster 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	12	18	12	8

Season 13 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
165 133rd	.380 138th	10 224th	49 246th	30 250th

Career Honors

S162nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 13)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
8	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	14	.214	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	3.93
9	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	6	27	.333	4	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.01
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	18	.500	8	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.38
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	22	.455	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.64
13	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	7	24	.292	8	1	1	0.25	17	.941	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.82
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	7	37	.378	6	2	1	0.40	15	.933	.	.	.	.	23.5	7.50
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	19	.526	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.57
18	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	15	.000	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.0	3.33
21	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	3	25	.600	7	2	3	0.40	21	.857	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.07
25	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	20	.550	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.86
26	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	23	.478	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.13
29	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	7	26	.269	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.19
31	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	22	.227	10	1	2	0.33	16	.875	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.53
Total		49	165	3.37	54	292	.380	68	10	22	0.20	173	.873	2	0.04	2	1.000	190.5	6.46

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 13)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
8	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	8	2.00	17	2	.882	9.0	3.93
9	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	7	1.40	18	1.92	38	7	.816	17.5	6.01
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	1.87	15	1	.933	12.0	6.38
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	3	0.75	14	2.12	26	4	.846	16.0	6.64
13	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	15	2.16	32	2	.938	16.0	6.82
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	19	2.27	37	1	.973	23.5	7.50
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	8	2.19	16	1	.938	15.0	8.57
18	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	15	2.26	27	3	.889	5.0	3.33
21	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	20	2.13	40	4	.900	20.5	7.07
25	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	12	2.42	19	2	.895	13.5	7.86
26	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	14	2.24	25	1	.960	14.5	7.13
29	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	9	1.66	29	6	.793	15.0	5.19
31	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	1	1.67	4	1.33	14	2.10	30	4	.867	13.0	7.53
Total		49	1	29	30	2	0.61	49	1.00	171	2.10	351	38	.892	190.5	6.46