Players

Dakota Jackel 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	15	16	8	-

Season 14 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
222 75th	.586 21st	25 63rd	22 347th	75 22nd

Career Honors

S152nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	6	.500	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.63
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	8	.750	3	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.36
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.95
9	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	18	.389	8	2	3	0.40	18	.833	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.36
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	7	.429	8	2	1	0.67	17	.941	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.90
12	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	12	.583	8	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.44
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	12	.833	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.31
16	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	12	.333	8	2	2	0.40	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.73
19	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	17	.529	10	1	0	0.20	21	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.03
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	15	.333	2	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.50
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	22	.591	7	2	1	0.50	18	.944	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.43
23	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	3	23	.652	8	1	2	0.20	22	.909	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.37
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	1	13	.846	5	2	3	0.40	18	.833	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.52
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.59
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	17	.824	5	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.20
32	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	18	.611	6	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.66
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	13	.846	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	9	.889	4	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.98
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	13	.538	1	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.86
40	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	12	.083	9	4	3	1.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.39
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.91
45	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	19	.579	8	0	1	0.00	21	.952	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.14
Total		85	222	2.61	45	302	.586	119	25	36	0.29	327	.890	.	.	.	.	287.5	7.15

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.63
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.36
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.95
9	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.36
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.90
12	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.44
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.31
16	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.73
19	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.03
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.50
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	3	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.43
23	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.37
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.52
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.59
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.20
32	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.66
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.98
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.86
40	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.39
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.91
45	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.14
Total		85	6	69	75	5	0.88	22	0.26	.	.	.	.	.	287.5	7.15