Players

Career Honors

S151st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	19	.474	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.58
2	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.42
5	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	13	.308	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.02
6	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	11	.364	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.81
8	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	10	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.19
9	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	13	.615	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.30
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	13	.385	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.06
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	13	.231	9	0	1	0.00	19	.947	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.70
17	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	3	19	.684	6	0	4	0.00	16	.750	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.29
18	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	19	.474	6	2	4	0.40	16	.750	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.36
21	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	20	.350	6	1	4	0.20	17	.765	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.30
22	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	1	11	.727	7	2	2	0.40	18	.889	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.97
25	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.42
26	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	15	.267	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.23
29	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	20	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.58
30	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	16	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.01
34	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	18	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.20
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	11	.545	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.02
39	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	6	20	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.28
Total		79	178	2.25	58	281	.427	40	6	19	0.08	111	.829	.	.	.	.	217.5	5.99

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.58
2	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.42
5	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.02
6	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.81
8	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.19
9	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	2	1	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.30
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.06
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.70
17	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.29
18	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.36
21	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.30
22	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.97
25	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.42
26	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.23
29	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.58
30	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.01
34	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.20
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.02
39	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.28
Total		79	5	57	62	4	0.78	18	0.23	.	.	.	.	.	217.5	5.99