Players

Grady Pyne 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	15	16	12	-

Season 15 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
252 41st	.527 39th	22 100th	20 355th	76 26th

Career Honors

S151st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.32
3	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	7	17	.176	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
5	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	15	.533	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.48
6	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	20	.300	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.44
10	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	11	.636	8	3	2	1.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.66
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	5	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.11
13	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	14	.786	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	14.5	9.13
16	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	2	19	.737	5	0	2	0.00	21	.905	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.59
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	6	23	.391	7	2	2	0.67	15	.867	.	.	.	.	19.5	10.00
20	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	7	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.66
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	3	22	.636	4	2	3	0.40	17	.824	.	.	.	.	20.5	6.68
24	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	7	28	.357	3	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.79
25	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	14	.643	7	3	2	0.75	18	.889	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.86
27	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	19	.684	9	4	2	1.00	20	.900	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.22
29	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	9	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.5	10.00
32	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	19	.368	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.01
36	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	12	.250	4	1	4	0.20	16	.750	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.76
37	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	15	.733	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.60
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	12	.917	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
42	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	6	22	.409	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.64
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	12	.167	11	4	3	1.00	23	.870	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.37
46	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	16	.688	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.64
Total		84	252	3.00	66	353	.527	94	22	37	0.26	260	.858	.	.	.	.	314.0	7.32

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.32
3	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
5	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.48
6	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.44
10	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	2	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.66
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.11
13	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	9.13
16	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	2	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.59
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	10.00
20	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.66
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	6.68
24	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.79
25	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.86
27	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.22
29	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	10.00
32	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.01
36	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.76
37	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.60
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
42	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.64
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.37
46	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.64
Total		84	4	72	76	8	0.90	20	0.24	.	.	.	.	.	314.0	7.32