Players

Marshall McCormick 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	14	15	16	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	20	.350	3	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.30
2	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	14	-.214	3	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.12
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	20	.300	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	5.28
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	10	.000	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.59
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	15	.000	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.19
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	23	.174	6	4	1	1.00	15	.933	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	3.93
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	13	.308	11	0	1	0.00	19	.947	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.38
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	7	.143	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	2	.000	2.5	4.32
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	4.0	2.98
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	7	26	.077	7	2	2	0.50	16	.875	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.62
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	18	.222	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	1	0.33	2	.500	7.5	4.24
29	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	10	.100	10	1	1	0.25	18	.944	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	4.24
30	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	18	.333	12	3	1	1.00	19	.947	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.5	7.87
34	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	7	27	.111	3	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.06
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	14	.357	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.0	4.58
40	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	22	.136	9	1	1	0.20	18	.944	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	4.81
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	11	.000	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.05
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	12	.083	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.5	1.95
Total		64	104	1.63	58	292	.158	90	15	21	0.23	234	.910	3	0.05	11	.273	135.0	4.42

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	9	1.86	22	2	.909	8.0	3.30
2	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	2.63	8	0	1.000	3.0	4.12
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	3	1.64	14	2	.857	14.0	5.28
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	9	3.00	6	2.17	12	1	.917	4.5	5.59
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.31	13	1	.923	5.0	4.19
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	16	2.03	35	4	.886	13.0	3.93
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	16	2.13	31	2	.935	9.0	4.38
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	13	2.42	19	1	.947	2.5	4.32
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.18	17	2	.882	4.0	2.98
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	10	2.21	24	1	.958	12.0	5.62
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	11	2.04	24	2	.917	7.5	4.24
29	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	10	2.05	20	3	.850	5.0	4.24
30	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	11	3.67	8	2.33	15	0	1.000	12.5	7.87
34	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	19	2.22	36	2	.944	10.5	4.06
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	12	2.04	24	4	.833	8.0	4.58
40	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	24	2.50	36	2	.944	8.5	4.81
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	13	2.32	22	2	.909	4.5	4.05
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	11	1.78	27	7	.741	3.5	1.95
Total		64	0	32	32	0	0.50	82	1.28	204	2.15	399	38	.905	135.0	4.42