Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	14	.357	12	2	1	0.50	20	.950	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.21
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	9	.000	5	1	4	0.25	13	.692	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.94
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	9	.000	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.12
6	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	6	25	.040	9	2	1	0.50	18	.944	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.54
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	9	26	.038	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.30
15	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	24	.292	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.02
18	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	24	.250	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.80
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	18	-.056	0	0	2	0.00	3	.333	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.52
29	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	27	.370	9	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.24
Total		31	72	2.32	43	176	.165	41	8	16	0.26	100	.840	.	.	.	.	87.0	6.08

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.21
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.94
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.12
6	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.54
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.30
15	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.02
18	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.80
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.52
29	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.24
Total		31	1	12	13	2	0.42	42	1.35	.	.	.	.	.	87.0	6.08