Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	5	19	-.053	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.70
5	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	7	14	-.286	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.28
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	8	-.125	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.86
11	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	5	10	-.400	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.18
15	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	26	.269	6	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.98
17	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	5	14	-.214	4	1	2	0.25	11	.818	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.78
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	7	.143	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.14
26	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	6	.167	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.92
41	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	9	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.19
Total		31	28	0.90	31	112	-.027	30	3	14	0.10	87	.839	.	.	.	.	36.5	3.89

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.70
5	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.28
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.86
11	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.18
15	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.98
17	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.78
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.14
26	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.92
41	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.19
Total		31	1	9	10	3	0.32	31	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	36.5	3.89