Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	14	-.071	1	1	3	0.33	8	.625	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.28
5	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	5	19	-.158	6	2	4	0.40	16	.750	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.56
6	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	15	.133	7	0	5	0.00	15	.667	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.13
8	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	3	9	-.333	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.34
10	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	16	-.063	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.84
14	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	7	.571	6	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.97
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	16	.250	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.86
17	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	18	.167	9	1	4	0.20	23	.826	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.47
21	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	10	.400	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.39
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	2	0	4	0.00	8	.500	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.72
26	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	21	.286	2	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.79
29	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	6	-.167	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.39
30	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.84
34	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	7	16	-.375	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.92
40	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	0	19	.368	6	1	0	0.20	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.94
44	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	7	-.143	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.05
Total		58	61	1.05	43	202	.089	69	11	38	0.19	194	.804	.	.	.	.	88.5	4.84

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.28
5	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.56
6	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.13
8	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.34
10	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.84
14	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.97
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.86
17	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.47
21	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.39
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.72
26	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.79
29	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.39
30	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.84
34	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.92
40	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.94
44	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.05
Total		58	3	27	30	3	0.52	65	1.12	.	.	.	.	.	88.5	4.84