Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	12	2	2	0.67	20	.900	38	12.67	58	.655	2.0	7.91
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	38	12.67	59	.644	3.0	8.10
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	27	9.00	63	.429	2.5	4.76
7	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	8	.375	9	1	5	0.20	24	.792	49	9.80	88	.557	6.0	6.31
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	2	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	28	9.33	53	.528	1.0	4.34
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	32	10.67	57	.561	1.5	5.42
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	9	0	2	0.00	15	.867	36	12.00	55	.655	3.0	7.71
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	36	12.00	63	.571	3.0	6.68
Total		26	13	0.50	2	31	.355	47	4	15	0.15	120	.875	284	10.92	496	.573	22.0	6.40

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.91
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.10
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.76
7	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	13	2.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.31
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.34
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.42
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.71
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.68
Total		26	3	4	7	0	0.27	31	1.19	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	6.40