Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	4	1.00	10	.400	0.0	5.20
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	4	0.33	7	.429	5	1.67	6	.833	1.0	6.08
7	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	3	0.20	12	.750	8	1.60	15	.533	1.0	3.86
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	3.85
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	7.45
29	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	3	0	1.00	11	1.000	1	0.33	2	.500	3.0	4.63
Total		21	.	.	.	.	.	14	5	13	0.24	58	.776	24	1.14	44	.545	5.0	5.18

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	5	2.08	12	0	1.000	0.0	5.20
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.50	20	0	1.000	1.0	6.08
7	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	2.00	23	1	.957	1.0	3.86
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	2.08	12	0	1.000	0.0	3.85
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	4	1.90	10	2	.800	0.0	7.45
29	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	1.91	22	2	.909	3.0	4.63
Total		21	.	.	.	.	.	33	1.57	45	2.09	99	5	.949	5.0	5.18