Players

Marcos Lewis 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	15	12	12	7

Career Honors

S31st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	28	.393	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.20
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	21	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.98
6	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	15	.133	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.51
7	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	25	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.30
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	19	.421	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.42
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	23	.087	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.57
12	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	16	.063	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.54
14	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	10	.700	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.95
16	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	9	45	.244	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	26.0	9.26
17	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	2	23	.522	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.90
20	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	8	33	.091	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.55
22	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	22	.136	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.71
24	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	22	.136	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.92
25	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	13	-.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.57
28	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	2	24	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.93
29	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	11	38	.079	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.46
32	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	7	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.21
33	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	22	.045	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.50
36	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	16	.188	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.70
37	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	14	-.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.70
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.87
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	10	-.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.81
Total		82	190	2.32	93	458	.212	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	239.5	5.53

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	14	3.50	NA	NA	25	0	1.000	18.5	9.20
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	NA	NA	15	0	1.000	13.0	7.98
6	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	NA	NA	20	3	.850	5.5	2.51
7	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	NA	NA	30	4	.867	13.5	5.30
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	8	0	1.000	16.0	8.42
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	12	3.00	NA	NA	37	4	.892	10.5	4.57
12	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	6	1.50	NA	NA	29	0	1.000	7.0	5.54
14	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	NA	NA	16	1	.938	7.5	4.95
16	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	6	1.20	NA	NA	29	1	.966	26.0	9.26
17	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	NA	NA	23	2	.913	16.0	7.90
20	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	15	3.00	NA	NA	34	1	.971	16.0	6.55
22	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	10	2.50	NA	NA	31	2	.935	10.0	5.71
24	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	8	2.00	NA	NA	17	1	.941	7.5	3.92
25	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	7	2.33	NA	NA	26	6	.769	6.5	3.57
28	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	11	2.75	NA	NA	27	2	.926	16.5	7.93
29	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	5	1.00	NA	NA	25	1	.960	15.0	6.46
32	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	25	3	.880	2.0	2.21
33	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	13	2.60	NA	NA	18	2	.889	12.5	4.50
36	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	NA	NA	30	0	1.000	10.5	5.70
37	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	NA	NA	22	2	.909	4.0	2.70
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	NA	NA	32	1	.969	4.5	4.87
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	NA	NA	24	5	.792	1.0	1.81
Total		82	3	53	56	9	0.68	168	2.05	0	0.00	543	41	.924	239.5	5.53