Players

Taylor Skinner 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	15	14	13	11	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	19	.000	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.61
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	10	.300	2	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.32
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.48
8	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	9	27	-.111	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.09
11	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	21	.095	3	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.99
13	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	29	.172	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.12
15	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	19	.421	8	1	3	0.33	15	.800	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.89
18	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	6	26	.231	6	1	4	0.33	12	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	7.41
19	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	18	.222	4	0	2	0.00	17	.882	1	0.20	1	1.000	8.5	2.79
21	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	10	-.100	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	3.0	2.21
22	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.24
29	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	26	.346	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.0	6.77
33	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	22	.409	7	0	5	0.00	18	.722	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.01
34	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	7	25	.080	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.03
38	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	9	28	.036	0	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.82
39	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	22	.455	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.64
41	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	30	.267	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.33
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	22	.182	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.21
46	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	26	.269	1	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	15.5	4.98
Total		64	171	2.67	92	404	.196	58	6	36	0.09	196	.816	2	0.03	4	.500	196.5	5.37

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	11	2.19	21	2	.905	8.0	4.61
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	13	2.20	25	1	.960	4.5	3.32
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	5	2.44	9	0	1.000	8.0	5.48
8	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	9	2.26	19	1	.947	7.0	4.09
11	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	10	1.96	26	2	.923	10.5	4.99
13	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	7	2.20	15	0	1.000	10.5	6.12
15	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	11	2.32	19	1	.947	12.0	7.89
18	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.12	26	1	.962	13.0	7.41
19	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	13	1.84	37	5	.865	8.5	2.79
21	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	1.92	24	2	.917	3.0	2.21
22	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	9	2.17	23	2	.913	6.5	4.24
29	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	15	2.14	29	2	.931	16.0	6.77
33	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	6	1.50	12	2.24	29	0	1.000	17.0	8.01
34	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	20	2.03	37	8	.784	10.0	4.03
38	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	18	2.00	37	5	.865	10.0	3.82
39	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	15	2.40	25	1	.960	13.0	7.64
41	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	11	2.04	24	3	.875	14.0	7.33
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	9	2.41	17	0	1.000	9.5	6.21
46	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	9	1.63	30	7	.767	15.5	4.98
Total		64	3	33	36	1	0.56	60	0.94	217	2.09	472	43	.909	196.5	5.37