Players

Bobby Draper 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	12	9	13	9	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	3	27	.481	6	2	4	0.67	12	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	18.0	8.62
3	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	22	5.50	7	42	.357	12	1	2	0.25	19	.895	0	0.00	1	.000	24.0	9.25
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	19	.263	4	0	5	0.00	13	.615	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.86
7	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	5	14	.000	7	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.23
9	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	12	.167	4	1	2	0.25	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	2.89
11	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	13	.231	10	3	3	0.75	20	.850	2	0.50	3	.667	8.0	3.68
14	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	18	.222	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.83
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	8	-.125	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.55
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	12	.083	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.06
19	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	15	.333	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.37
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	15	.267	6	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.94
25	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	15	.200	8	2	3	0.40	15	.800	1	0.20	2	.500	9.0	3.94
29	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	8	.750	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.01
33	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	10	.400	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.09
34	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	14	.143	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.61
40	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	10	.600	7	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	5.02
45	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	4	15	-.133	2	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.58
Total		66	120	1.82	50	267	.262	86	11	37	0.17	217	.829	4	0.06	9	.444	155.0	4.80

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.33	24	0	1.000	18.0	8.62
3	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	8	2.00	16	2.24	25	2	.920	24.0	9.25
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	15	2.42	24	0	1.000	9.0	4.86
7	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	9	1.80	22	2.18	38	5	.868	6.5	4.23
9	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	12	1.80	35	7	.800	7.0	2.89
11	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	19	2.18	33	2	.939	8.0	3.68
14	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	13	2.19	27	2	.926	8.0	4.83
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	14	2.35	20	2	.900	1.5	4.55
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	11	12	0	4.00	2	0.67	9	2.22	18	0	1.000	11.5	5.06
19	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	15	2.23	26	1	.962	6.0	3.37
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	7	2.19	16	0	1.000	10.0	5.94
25	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	22	2.20	40	4	.900	9.0	3.94
29	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	14	1.97	30	4	.867	9.0	4.01
33	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	23	2.21	42	3	.929	9.0	4.09
34	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	7	1.40	23	2.28	39	2	.949	8.0	4.61
40	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	16	2.57	21	0	1.000	7.0	5.02
45	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	20	1.98	44	6	.864	3.5	2.58
Total		66	4	40	44	3	0.67	84	1.27	272	2.19	502	40	.920	155.0	4.80