Players

Marty McSorley 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	11	14	11	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	23	.130	9	1	5	0.20	16	.688	0	0.00	2	.000	9.5	2.35
3	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	20	-.100	5	1	3	0.33	12	.750	1	0.33	2	.500	5.0	3.79
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	13	.154	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.43
6	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	8	22	-.136	4	1	2	0.25	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.37
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	9	.111	12	3	2	1.00	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	2.95
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	8	-.250	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	1.0	2.36
10	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	16	.188	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.37
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	15	.133	2	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.07
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	9	.444	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.27
15	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	22	.273	5	1	3	0.20	14	.786	1	0.20	2	.500	13.0	4.81
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	8	22	.045	3	0	4	0.00	13	.692	1	0.20	1	1.000	11.0	4.32
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	20	.450	8	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.15
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	11	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.56
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	9	-.222	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.20
26	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	24	.292	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	5.81
Total		56	93	1.66	59	245	.139	70	8	31	0.14	164	.811	4	0.07	10	.400	119.0	3.99

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	8	1.55	31	9	.710	9.5	2.35
3	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	11	1.96	25	5	.800	5.0	3.79
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	9	1.75	28	5	.821	6.5	2.43
6	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	13	1.88	34	6	.824	8.0	3.37
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.65	17	4	.765	7.0	2.95
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	1.80	20	5	.750	1.0	2.36
10	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	17	2.06	34	5	.853	7.5	3.37
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	.	.	4	1.94	16	0	1.000	7.5	3.07
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	21	2.40	35	3	.914	7.0	4.27
15	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	23	2.38	42	2	.952	13.0	4.81
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	17	2.23	35	2	.943	11.0	4.32
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	10	2.12	17	3	.824	13.5	8.15
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	8	2.27	15	0	1.000	8.5	6.56
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	16	1.97	31	6	.806	1.0	2.20
26	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	13	2.07	28	3	.893	13.0	5.81
Total		56	1	34	35	1	0.63	62	1.11	182	2.02	408	58	.858	119.0	3.99