Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	2	1	6	0.25	13	.538	35	8.75	89	.393	2.0	3.78
4	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	6	.167	5	1	4	0.25	16	.750	43	10.75	74	.581	2.0	4.84
8	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	9	.333	3	1	3	0.33	12	.750	24	8.00	59	.407	4.0	3.60
10	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	7	1	4	0.25	17	.765	35	8.75	88	.398	3.0	4.97
14	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	19	6.33	57	.333	1.0	1.64
15	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	8	.375	3	0	6	0.00	14	.571	41	8.20	101	.406	3.5	3.42
17	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	17	5.67	59	.288	1.0	1.48
19	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	4	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	24	8.00	61	.393	5.0	4.49
21	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	6	.333	6	0	7	0.00	20	.650	53	10.60	92	.576	3.5	5.76
26	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	2	1	4	0.25	12	.667	40	10.00	83	.482	3.5	5.16
30	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	5	-.400	4	1	4	0.33	13	.692	30	10.00	70	.429	1.0	4.20
Total		41	18	0.44	3	55	.273	36	7	41	0.17	144	.715	361	8.80	833	.433	29.5	3.94

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.78
4	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.84
8	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.60
10	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.97
14	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.64
15	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.42
17	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.48
19	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.49
21	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.76
26	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.16
30	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.20
Total		41	1	7	8	3	0.20	39	0.95	.	.	.	.	.	29.5	3.94