Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	8	.000	3	1	2	0.20	11	.818	50	10.00	85	.588	5.0	4.99
4	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	29	9.67	65	.446	2.0	4.16
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	20	6.67	51	.392	1.0	2.20
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	7	.571	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	28	9.33	60	.467	5.0	6.09
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	0	0	2	0.00	5	.600	22	7.33	58	.379	1.0	2.47
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	9	.222	3	1	0	0.25	11	1.000	43	10.75	89	.483	4.0	5.66
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	26	8.67	64	.406	1.5	4.16
35	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	3	1	4	0.33	10	.600	32	10.67	67	.478	2.0	5.30
40	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	33	11.00	62	.532	1.5	5.02
Total		30	11	0.37	3	46	.174	19	4	16	0.13	80	.800	283	9.43	601	.471	23.0	4.45

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.99
4	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.16
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.20
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.09
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.47
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.66
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.16
35	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.30
40	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.02
Total		30	1	14	15	1	0.50	24	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	23.0	4.45