Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	8	-.125	8	1	4	0.33	14	.714	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.71
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	6	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.24
6	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	25	.280	6	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.52
7	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	4	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.46
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	17	.176	7	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.65
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	15	.333	9	2	2	0.40	16	.875	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.68
15	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	8	18	-.222	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.34
17	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	12	.250	11	2	2	0.67	17	.882	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.78
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	10	.600	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.92
20	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	4	15	.067	8	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.05
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	25	.360	8	2	3	0.40	18	.833	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.40
24	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	11	-.091	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.14
28	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	14	.286	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.45
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.43
32	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	15	.333	5	0	4	0.00	17	.765	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.03
35	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.30
Total		62	95	1.53	50	216	.208	85	11	31	0.18	210	.852	.	.	.	.	133.5	5.51

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.71
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.24
6	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	1	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.52
7	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.46
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.65
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	9	9	2	1.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.68
15	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.34
17	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.78
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.92
20	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.05
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	2	1.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.40
24	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.14
28	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.45
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.43
32	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.03
35	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.30
Total		62	3	49	52	8	0.84	33	0.53	.	.	.	.	.	133.5	5.51