Players

Kylar Montoya 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	13	11	14	11	3

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	7	25	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.56
2	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	20	.050	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.75
3	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	12	31	-.065	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.35
8	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	13	.538	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.94
10	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	29	.172	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.88
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	18	.389	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.17
13	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	14	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.19
15	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	21	.190	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	2.42
16	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	9	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.16
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	13	.308	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.46
18	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	13	.462	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.39
23	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	18	.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.52
26	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	16	.063	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.14
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	5	14	-.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.89
30	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.36
31	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	18	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.27
Total		57	104	1.82	57	281	.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	141.5	4.47

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	12	4.00	NA	NA	15	1	.933	9.5	5.56
2	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	11	3.67	NA	NA	28	2	.929	6.5	4.75
3	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	NA	NA	31	1	.968	12.5	6.35
8	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	11	2.75	NA	NA	28	3	.893	13.0	4.94
10	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	NA	NA	28	4	.857	13.5	4.88
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	NA	NA	15	1	.933	11.0	7.17
13	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	8	1.60	NA	NA	28	2	.929	5.5	4.19
15	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	NA	NA	34	4	.882	8.0	2.42
16	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	NA	NA	27	8	.704	2.0	3.16
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	NA	NA	17	2	.882	10.0	3.46
18	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	NA	NA	23	4	.826	10.0	4.39
23	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	6	1.50	NA	NA	26	0	1.000	10.0	5.52
26	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	9	3.00	NA	NA	11	2	.818	6.0	3.14
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	2	1	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	NA	NA	32	3	.906	5.5	3.89
30	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	1	2.00	7	2.33	NA	NA	19	2	.895	8.5	4.36
31	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	2	0.50	NA	NA	31	5	.839	10.0	3.27
Total		57	9	31	40	4	0.70	115	2.02	0	0.00	393	44	.888	141.5	4.47