Players

Kylar Montoya 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	13	11	14	11	3

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	8	35	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.17
4	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	29	.345	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.57
6	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	4	35	.457	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.08
7	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	11	31	.032	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.89
8	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	2	26	.538	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.90
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	16	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.21
11	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	30	.267	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.93
12	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	21	.476	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.53
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	8	46	.217	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.34
19	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	22	.545	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	5.40
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	5	13	-.077	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.96
23	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	12	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	1.70
25	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	22	4.40	5	42	.405	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.41
26	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	24	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.48
28	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	24	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.88
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	16	.188	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.05
33	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	26	.346	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	4.77
34	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	11	.727	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.66
36	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	22	.409	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.97
42	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	16	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.71
44	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	6	20	.050	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	2.54
Total		85	253	2.98	95	517	.306	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	302.0	6.01

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	11	2.20	NA	NA	31	7	.774	19.0	6.17
4	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	8	2.00	NA	NA	26	1	.962	17.0	8.57
6	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	NA	NA	33	3	.909	22.0	8.08
7	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	NA	NA	16	3	.813	13.0	5.89
8	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	NA	NA	16	0	1.000	20.0	9.90
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	NA	NA	29	4	.862	10.5	5.21
11	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	NA	NA	30	0	1.000	18.0	6.93
12	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	NA	NA	28	1	.964	13.5	7.53
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	NA	NA	33	2	.939	20.5	7.34
19	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	10	2.00	NA	NA	23	3	.870	17.5	5.40
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	NA	NA	23	2	.913	5.5	3.96
23	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	NA	NA	25	3	.880	4.0	1.70
25	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	9	1.80	NA	NA	33	2	.939	22.5	8.41
26	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	NA	NA	24	2	.917	13.0	4.48
28	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	NA	NA	37	6	.838	13.5	4.88
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	NA	NA	14	0	1.000	7.0	5.05
33	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	NA	NA	45	6	.867	17.0	4.77
34	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	21	1	.952	8.5	6.66
36	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	9	2.25	NA	NA	31	4	.871	19.0	6.97
42	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	NA	NA	20	1	.950	10.0	5.71
44	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	NA	NA	32	4	.875	11.0	2.54
Total		85	3	44	47	4	0.55	139	1.64	0	0.00	570	55	.904	302.0	6.01