Players

Wallace Carbonera Senior Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	14	15	17

Season 15 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,051 10th	37 309th	33 27th	68 151st	50 132nd

Career Honors

S152nd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

S162nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	7	.000	0	0	3	0.00	13	.769	58	14.50	93	.624	2.0	8.22
6	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	7	.286	11	2	2	0.40	25	.920	60	12.00	103	.583	5.0	7.61
7	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	9	.333	7	2	3	0.40	22	.864	67	13.40	105	.638	8.0	8.86
9	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	4	.000	5	2	3	0.50	17	.824	45	11.25	87	.517	2.5	5.72
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	5	.000	9	4	2	1.33	17	.882	43	14.33	65	.662	4.5	9.31
12	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	8	1	3	0.33	15	.800	39	13.00	58	.672	3.5	9.48
13	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	14	4	2	1.33	22	.909	39	13.00	62	.629	7.0	9.83
16	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	3	.667	11	6	4	1.50	23	.826	61	15.25	98	.622	9.0	9.84
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	24	8.00	62	.387	2.5	3.74
20	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	35	11.67	55	.636	7.0	7.96
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	5	.000	4	3	0	0.75	15	1.000	59	14.75	93	.634	6.5	9.63
22	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	34	11.33	58	.586	1.0	6.00
25	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	10	0	2	0.00	17	.882	40	13.33	52	.769	6.0	10.00
26	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	5	-.200	7	3	0	1.00	16	1.000	43	14.33	63	.683	5.5	9.90
31	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	6	.167	7	1	0	0.25	18	1.000	52	13.00	83	.627	3.0	8.57
32	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	5	.600	10	1	5	0.20	23	.783	65	13.00	93	.699	6.0	9.23
34	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	61	15.25	91	.670	0.5	7.44
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	48	16.00	72	.667	2.0	8.06
39	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	7	.571	4	1	1	0.25	17	.941	52	13.00	68	.765	5.5	8.00
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	5	.000	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	41	13.67	59	.695	0.5	7.68
44	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	9	2	5	0.67	18	.722	47	15.67	67	.701	6.5	10.00
46	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	38	12.67	64	.594	2.5	8.96
Total		79	37	0.47	10	108	.250	140	33	44	0.42	365	.879	1051	13.30	1651	.637	96.5	8.37

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.22
6	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.61
7	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.86
9	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.72
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.31
12	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.48
13	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	9.83
16	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	9.84
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.74
20	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	2	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.96
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	9.63
22	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.00
25	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	10.00
26	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.90
31	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.57
32	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	3	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.23
34	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	7.44
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.06
39	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.00
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	7.68
44	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	10.00
46	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.96
Total		79	3	47	50	5	0.63	68	0.86	.	.	.	.	.	96.5	8.37