Players

Earvin Kieffer Senior Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	16	14	9	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	12	.417	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.19
6	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	8	.125	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.06
7	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	14	.571	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.79
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	5	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.09
10	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	12	.833	6	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.03
12	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.60
14	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.78
16	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	12	.167	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.49
18	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	16	.625	7	3	1	1.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.71
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	16	.438	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.06
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	12	.083	3	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.01
22	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	14	.571	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.71
29	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	18	.444	8	2	1	0.40	16	.938	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.88
31	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
34	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	22	.455	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.06
38	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	12	.417	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.66
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	7	20	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.98
41	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	21	.524	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.42
44	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	13	.692	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.06
46	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	21	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.16
Total		73	184	2.52	59	283	.442	49	8	22	0.11	156	.859	.	.	.	.	220.0	6.29

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.19
6	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.06
7	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.79
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.09
10	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.03
12	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.60
14	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.78
16	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.49
18	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.71
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.06
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.01
22	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.71
29	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.88
31	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
34	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.06
38	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.66
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.98
41	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.42
44	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.06
46	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.16
Total		73	2	52	54	6	0.74	11	0.15	.	.	.	.	.	220.0	6.29