Players

Barry D. Hatchet Senior Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	14	-	-	17	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	0	0.25	10	1.000	5	1.25	9	.556	1.0	6.00
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.63
7	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	4.96
8	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	4.15
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	0	6	0.00	20	.700	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	7.15
12	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	5.30
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	1	0.33	16	.938	4	1.33	6	.667	1.0	5.51
16	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	6	1.000	0.0	4.33
17	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	13	.923	3	0.60	4	.750	0.0	5.35
19	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	1	0.33	2	.500	1.0	7.16
22	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	4	1.000	0.0	6.08
23	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	4.60
25	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	5	0.00	16	.688	3	0.60	5	.600	0.0	4.33
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	2.20
29	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	6.43
32	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	3	.667	0.0	4.80
34	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	4.85
39	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	.222	0.0	5.98
40	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	5.80
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	.417	0.0	4.10
45	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	9	.778	0.0	5.50
Total		81	.	.	.	.	.	31	3	14	0.04	96	.854	64	0.79	103	.621	3.0	5.20

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	18	2.11	37	4	.892	1.0	6.00
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	1	1.67	3	1	.667	0.0	4.63
7	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	2.36	11	1	.909	0.0	4.96
8	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	16	2.10	30	5	.833	0.0	4.15
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.37	27	0	1.000	0.0	7.15
12	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.05	19	2	.895	0.0	5.30
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.07	28	2	.929	1.0	5.51
16	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	24	2.33	42	1	.976	0.0	4.33
17	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	17	2.19	36	2	.944	0.0	5.35
19	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	4	2.09	11	0	1.000	1.0	7.16
22	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	18	2.54	26	1	.962	0.0	6.08
23	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	17	2.05	43	3	.930	0.0	4.60
25	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	19	2.33	33	1	.970	0.0	4.33
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	11	1.79	24	4	.833	0.0	2.20
29	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.39	18	1	.944	0.0	6.43
32	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	17	2.31	29	2	.931	0.0	4.80
34	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.10	20	3	.850	0.0	4.85
39	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	8	1.91	23	1	.957	0.0	5.98
40	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	16	2.19	32	1	.969	0.0	5.80
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	14	2.00	34	3	.912	0.0	4.10
45	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	18	2.37	30	1	.967	0.0	5.50
Total		81	.	.	.	.	.	126	1.56	281	2.18	556	39	.930	3.0	5.20