Players

Quentin Soullard Senior Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	15	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	8	.250	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.36
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.81
5	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	21	.190	10	3	1	0.60	20	.950	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.99
6	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	13	.077	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.53
8	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.72
9	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	16	.250	8	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.39
11	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	8	13	-.385	6	1	1	0.20	16	.938	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.54
12	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
14	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	7	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.02
15	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	16	.125	6	2	4	0.40	16	.750	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.43
18	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	6	3	0	1.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.43
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	1	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.62
26	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.08
31	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	15	.200	4	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.94
33	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	14	.571	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.66
46	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	9	.889	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.90
Total		56	98	1.75	48	185	.270	71	16	23	0.29	185	.876	.	.	.	.	136.5	5.71

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.36
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.81
5	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.99
6	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.53
8	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.72
9	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.39
11	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.54
12	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
14	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.02
15	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	2	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.43
18	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.43
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.62
26	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.08
31	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.94
33	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.66
46	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.90
Total		56	4	37	41	10	0.73	17	0.30	.	.	.	.	.	136.5	5.71