Players

Guido Gardini Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	14	16	16	15	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	16	-.188	0	0	1	0.00	3	.667	.	.	.	.	1.5	1.58
2	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	20	.300	2	2	2	0.67	9	.778	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.67
4	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	12	.083	4	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	3.16
6	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	16	.125	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.36
7	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	9	.333	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.52
9	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	7	18	-.056	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.51
10	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	11	.455	5	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.91
11	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	15	.267	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	1	0.25	1	1.000	6.5	2.06
14	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	20	.250	9	0	1	0.00	19	.947	3	0.60	3	1.000	11.0	3.98
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	19	.158	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	2	0.67	2	1.000	8.5	4.95
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	8	.125	11	3	0	1.00	15	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.0	4.14
18	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	13	.308	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.0	4.41
21	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	10	.200	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.75
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	6	29	.276	5	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.51
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	25	.280	12	1	1	0.20	22	.955	1	0.20	2	.500	14.0	5.44
29	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	11	.364	2	0	4	0.00	9	.556	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	2.72
Total		58	104	1.79	53	252	.202	69	8	25	0.14	181	.862	11	0.19	13	.846	131.5	4.10

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	4	1.69	13	1	.923	1.5	1.58
2	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	10	3.33	3	1.64	14	1	.929	13.0	5.67
4	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	13	1.85	27	7	.741	5.5	3.16
6	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	7	1.75	17	1.98	40	4	.900	7.5	3.36
7	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	9	2.28	18	0	1.000	6.0	4.52
9	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	13	2.23	22	2	.909	7.5	4.51
10	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	8	2.00	14	2.04	26	4	.846	7.0	3.91
11	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	11	1.81	26	6	.769	6.5	2.06
14	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	21	1.94	48	8	.833	11.0	3.98
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	12	2.15	26	2	.923	8.5	4.95
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.07	14	3	.786	7.0	4.14
18	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	13	2.20	25	2	.920	9.0	4.41
21	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	11	2.50	16	0	1.000	5.5	4.75
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	8	1.94	31	2	.935	15.5	6.51
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	16	2.27	30	4	.867	14.0	5.44
29	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	14	1.86	29	6	.793	6.5	2.72
Total		58	0	39	39	4	0.67	66	1.14	187	2.02	405	52	.872	131.5	4.10