Players

Dylan Krueger Senior Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	15	16	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	0	0	1	0.00	4	.750	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.21
3	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	7	22	.136	6	1	1	0.20	19	.947	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.66
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	13	.385	2	2	0	0.67	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.00
6	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	17	.529	12	2	2	0.40	21	.905	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.71
7	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	1	18	.667	9	3	3	0.60	24	.875	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.60
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	11	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.68
12	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	22	4.40	6	33	.485	4	1	5	0.20	17	.706	.	.	.	.	26.0	8.92
15	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	18	.611	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.39
16	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	4	24	.667	2	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.37
17	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	0	13	.923	8	3	1	0.60	17	.941	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.79
18	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	15	.933	6	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	17.5	10.00
20	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.26
30	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	16	.563	7	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.37
33	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	10	.600	6	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.27
34	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	9	.667	5	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.24
35	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.84
39	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.5	10.00
40	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	19	.474	7	2	3	0.40	18	.833	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.56
44	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	5	25	.600	6	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	22.5	9.16
45	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	16	.313	5	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.24
Total		80	225	2.81	53	315	.546	106	19	33	0.24	291	.887	.	.	.	.	286.0	7.36

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.21
3	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.66
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.00
6	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.71
7	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.60
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.68
12	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	26.0	8.92
15	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	1	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.39
16	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.37
17	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.79
18	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	10.00
20	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	2	4	6	1	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.26
30	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.37
33	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.27
34	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.24
35	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.84
39	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	10.00
40	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.56
44	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	9.16
45	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.24
Total		80	5	74	79	8	0.99	30	0.38	.	.	.	.	.	286.0	7.36