Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	7	1.75	11	.636	0.0	10.00
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	4	1.33	6	.667	1.0	6.18
8	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	7.58
10	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	9.13
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	4.20
15	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.25	12	.917	4	1.00	7	.571	1.0	8.13
17	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	4	4	0.80	16	.750	4	0.80	9	.444	4.0	8.61
29	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	8	2.00	12	.667	0.0	5.04
34	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	3	3	0.60	25	.880	8	1.60	12	.667	3.0	9.69
41	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	16	.938	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	9.39
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	47	9	14	0.24	124	.887	44	1.16	78	.564	9.0	7.80

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	17	2.67	24	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	2.22	9	0	1.000	1.0	6.18
8	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	14	2.81	16	0	1.000	0.0	7.58
10	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	5	2.36	11	0	1.000	0.0	9.13
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.08	13	2	.846	0.0	4.20
15	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	12	2.38	24	0	1.000	1.0	8.13
17	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	13	2.45	22	1	.955	4.0	8.61
29	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	5	1.81	16	1	.938	0.0	5.04
34	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	19	2.59	29	0	1.000	3.0	9.69
41	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.75	14	2.40	25	1	.960	0.0	9.39
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	108	2.84	111	2.42	189	5	.974	9.0	7.80