Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	7	.143	10	2	1	0.50	18	.944	40	10.00	90	.444	4.0	6.17
9	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	7	.429	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	31	10.33	73	.425	3.0	5.58
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	4	0	2	0.00	16	.875	51	12.75	93	.548	1.5	7.46
15	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	6	1	3	0.33	15	.800	31	10.33	68	.456	2.0	6.51
16	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	6	.833	2	1	1	0.25	15	.933	41	10.25	78	.526	6.5	5.38
17	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	10	3	2	0.60	17	.882	59	11.80	96	.615	5.5	7.96
18	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	7	.143	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	50	16.67	78	.641	3.0	8.54
21	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	7	.000	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	30	10.00	53	.566	4.0	6.49
25	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	37	12.33	70	.529	4.5	8.40
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	2	0	5	0.00	8	.375	34	11.33	51	.667	3.0	7.07
Total		35	17	0.49	6	49	.224	47	9	20	0.26	129	.845	404	11.54	750	.539	37.0	6.96

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.17
9	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.58
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.46
15	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.51
16	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.38
17	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.96
18	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.54
21	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.49
25	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.40
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.07
Total		35	2	18	20	2	0.57	49	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	37.0	6.96