Players

Javier Sanchez Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	13	12	17	14	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	10	34	.118	3	0	5	0.00	11	.545	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.02
2	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	27	.407	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.67
3	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	17	.235	3	1	4	0.20	12	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	3.95
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	15	.067	2	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.92
5	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	4	0	3	0.00	9	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	3.03
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	8	.000	3	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.25
9	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.04
10	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	23	.087	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.98
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	16	.438	9	3	1	0.75	17	.941	1	0.25	1	1.000	12.5	5.53
13	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	14	.714	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.0	5.12
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	5	24	.375	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	15.0	6.97
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	23	.217	4	2	6	0.40	13	.538	1	0.20	1	1.000	12.5	3.17
18	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	2	31	.581	4	2	2	0.50	13	.846	1	0.25	1	1.000	24.0	7.64
21	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	32	.531	2	1	1	0.20	11	.909	1	0.20	1	1.000	21.0	5.46
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	21	.333	6	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.59
25	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	17	.412	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.80
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	26	5.20	4	37	.595	7	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	26.5	6.60
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	30	.400	6	1	3	0.20	17	.824	.	.	.	.	20.5	6.57
Total		67	210	3.13	66	392	.367	71	13	36	0.19	202	.822	6	0.09	8	.750	240.5	5.41

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	11	1.85	26	7	.731	15.5	6.02
2	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	11	3.67	9	1.90	20	5	.750	14.5	7.67
3	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	15	2.27	26	3	.885	11.5	3.95
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	13	1.90	29	6	.793	7.0	2.92
5	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	4	1.58	12	1	.917	5.0	3.03
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	7	2.33	12	0	1.000	3.5	4.25
9	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	9	1.96	24	2	.917	8.5	5.04
10	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18	2.41	29	2	.931	8.0	4.98
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	19	2.33	30	3	.900	12.5	5.53
13	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	1.86	22	4	.818	11.0	5.12
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	10	2.10	20	2	.900	15.0	6.97
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	8	1.60	13	1.78	37	7	.811	12.5	3.17
18	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	15	2.00	40	3	.925	24.0	7.64
21	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	14	1.81	37	7	.811	21.0	5.46
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	6	1.88	17	1	.941	14.0	7.59
25	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.03	31	3	.903	10.0	4.80
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	11	1.72	29	5	.828	26.5	6.60
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	3	0.60	11	2.03	31	2	.935	20.5	6.57
Total		67	0	35	35	5	0.52	69	1.03	207	1.99	472	63	.867	240.5	5.41