Players

Diego Ferraro Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	16	16	16	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	22	.227	7	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.17
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	22	.182	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.5	2.90
6	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	9	34	.059	4	2	3	0.40	13	.769	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.18
9	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	8	41	.268	4	2	3	0.40	13	.769	.	.	.	.	24.0	7.51
11	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	16	.188	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.44
12	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	7	33	.364	4	1	3	0.25	13	.769	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.11
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	17	.176	6	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.5	4.91
15	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	19	.474	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	1	0.25	1	1.000	12.5	6.17
17	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	4	41	.415	6	3	0	0.60	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	24.5	7.12
18	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	0	18	.611	10	1	0	0.25	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.77
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	6	15	.067	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.01
22	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	21	.238	5	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.53
25	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	2	31	.516	6	2	1	0.40	15	.933	.	.	.	.	22.5	7.72
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	13	.308	0	0	2	0.00	5	.600	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.44
29	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	25	.200	9	2	0	0.67	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.69
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	9	.333	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.09
34	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.81
38	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	11	.273	8	2	2	0.40	18	.889	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.82
39	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	6	22	.273	5	2	2	0.67	12	.833	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.0	6.60
Total		74	199	2.69	75	424	.292	88	19	27	0.26	228	.882	4	0.05	4	1.000	239.0	5.42

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	5	2.00	13	0	1.000	11.5	7.17
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	6	1.54	28	6	.786	7.5	2.90
6	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	6	1.20	19	2.24	38	2	.947	15.5	5.18
9	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	1	1.00	7	1.40	19	2.11	37	3	.919	24.0	7.51
11	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	3	0.60	13	2.23	26	1	.962	8.0	3.44
12	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.22	23	0	1.000	20.0	7.11
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	8	2.18	17	2	.882	7.5	4.91
15	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	11	2.21	19	2	.895	12.5	6.17
17	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	3	0.60	14	2.15	26	3	.885	24.5	7.12
18	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	17	2.33	33	1	.970	14.0	6.77
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	9	2.13	24	1	.958	8.0	5.01
22	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	16	2.19	32	3	.906	11.5	4.53
25	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	19	2.29	35	2	.943	22.5	7.72
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	20	2.42	33	1	.970	5.0	3.44
29	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	8	2.07	15	1	.933	12.0	6.69
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	11	2.26	19	2	.895	6.0	5.09
34	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	9	1.81	27	4	.852	7.5	2.81
38	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	15	1.94	32	7	.781	7.5	2.82
39	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.00	21	2	.905	14.0	6.60
Total		74	1	40	41	4	0.55	64	0.86	240	2.13	498	43	.914	239.0	5.42