Players

Diego Ferraro Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	16	16	16	9

Season 15 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
230 64th	.487 68th	24 84th	81 101st	52 119th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	12	.750	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	2	.000	12.0	6.41
2	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	24	.208	6	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.67
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	14	.429	2	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.08
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	10	.200	8	2	1	0.50	15	.933	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.43
10	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	15	.333	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.50
12	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	23	.304	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	2	0.40	2	1.000	11.5	2.82
13	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	16	.188	10	5	2	1.00	18	.889	1	0.20	1	1.000	14.0	4.53
15	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	8	35	.343	13	1	3	0.20	25	.880	0	0.00	1	.000	24.0	9.35
19	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	19	.737	5	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.25
22	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	28	.571	5	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	7.22
23	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	2	26	.615	4	2	4	0.40	17	.765	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	6.24
25	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	4	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.00
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	23	.522	13	2	3	0.40	25	.880	0	0.00	1	.000	19.5	7.67
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	15	.867	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.36
31	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	10	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.14
34	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	9	3	0	1.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.45
36	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	13	.615	5	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.75
39	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	21	.571	4	0	3	0.00	19	.842	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.55
41	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	16	.375	1	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.40
44	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	19	.474	12	3	3	0.75	21	.857	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.50
46	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	15	.733	9	2	2	0.67	16	.875	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.86
Total		83	230	2.77	48	374	.487	133	24	34	0.29	326	.896	3	0.04	9	.333	281.0	5.96

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	7	2.13	15	1	.933	12.0	6.41
2	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	20	2.25	36	1	.972	11.5	4.67
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	1	0.20	19	2.13	38	3	.921	9.5	3.08
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	19	2.14	35	4	.886	8.5	4.43
10	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	16	2.41	22	2	.909	9.0	6.50
12	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	9	1.56	34	6	.824	11.5	2.82
13	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	4	0.80	18	2.43	30	0	1.000	14.0	4.53
15	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	10	2.00	19	2.46	28	1	.964	24.0	9.35
19	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	6	2.15	13	1	.923	17.0	8.25
22	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	13	2.08	24	3	.875	18.5	7.22
23	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	16	1.95	40	6	.850	21.5	6.24
25	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	11	2.60	15	0	1.000	7.5	5.00
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	7	1.40	8	2.32	19	0	1.000	19.5	7.67
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	1.93	15	1	.933	13.0	6.36
31	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	10	2.24	21	1	.952	8.5	6.14
34	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.18	17	2	.882	9.0	4.45
36	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.52	21	0	1.000	9.0	6.75
39	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	4	0.80	15	1.86	37	4	.892	15.0	4.55
41	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	15	2.10	29	3	.897	12.0	4.40
44	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	18	2.23	31	3	.903	16.0	7.50
46	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	10	2.47	17	0	1.000	14.5	8.86
Total		83	2	50	52	4	0.63	81	0.98	276	2.17	537	42	.922	281.0	5.96