Players

Fernando Ramos Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	13	16	15	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	22	.545	9	1	2	0.25	19	.895	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.86
6	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	21	7.00	5	32	.500	8	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	23.0	9.52
8	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	15	-.067	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.53
9	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.5	5.41
11	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	15	.600	8	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.17
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	17	.529	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.0	7.87
14	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	15	.200	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	0	0.00	2	.000	8.0	5.00
16	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	14	1.000	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.60
17	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	25	.400	5	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.63
20	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	20	.150	3	0	4	0.00	10	.600	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	6.16
21	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	19	.579	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.52
25	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	18	.444	5	0	1	0.00	19	.947	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.33
29	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	24	.458	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.38
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	4.42
35	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	25	.400	3	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.81
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	5.67
40	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	12	.250	3	1	2	0.33	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	4.86
44	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	22	.500	3	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.04
45	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	1	24	.708	4	1	2	0.25	12	.833	1	0.25	2	.500	20.5	7.74
Total		64	225	3.52	65	354	.452	86	9	25	0.14	243	.897	4	0.06	10	.400	254.0	6.76

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	16	2.46	26	0	1.000	18.0	8.86
6	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	10	3.33	14	2.22	27	1	.963	23.0	9.52
8	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	8	2.36	14	0	1.000	6.5	4.53
9	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	6	2.00	17	1	.941	9.5	5.41
11	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	12	2.25	20	2	.900	12.0	8.17
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	7	2.11	18	2	.889	14.0	7.87
14	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	3	1.89	9	1	.889	8.0	5.00
16	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	20	2.39	31	2	.935	15.0	7.60
17	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	10	2.37	19	0	1.000	16.0	7.63
20	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	15	2.16	25	5	.800	10.0	6.16
21	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	5	1.90	10	1	.900	15.0	7.52
25	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	20	2.47	30	1	.967	12.5	5.33
29	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	7	2.46	13	0	1.000	16.5	9.38
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	12	2.47	19	1	.947	6.5	4.42
35	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	18	2.18	34	3	.912	17.5	6.81
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	6	2.27	11	1	.909	9.0	5.67
40	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	5	1.93	14	2	.857	9.0	4.86
44	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	4	1.00	13	2.03	34	4	.882	15.5	6.04
45	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	16	2.23	30	1	.967	20.5	7.74
Total		64	0	40	40	3	0.63	68	1.06	213	2.24	401	28	.930	254.0	6.76