Players

John Dorian 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	16	13	14	15	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	20	.350	9	4	2	0.80	18	.889	1	0.20	1	1.000	17.5	5.30
6	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	12	.417	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.85
7	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	13	.615	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.88
9	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	20	.250	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.0	2.59
11	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	18	.167	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	6.30
12	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	17	.706	2	2	2	0.67	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	16.0	7.58
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	10	.400	8	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.57
16	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	14	.500	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	1	0.25	2	.500	10.0	4.38
19	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	13	.000	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	2.70
20	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	20	.150	15	4	2	0.80	24	.917	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.28
22	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	18	.111	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.45
24	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	11	.182	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.37
26	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	7	.000	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.75
28	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	4	11	.000	4	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	7.0	3.81
30	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	14	.000	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.05
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	15	.333	5	1	1	0.20	15	.933	2	0.40	3	.667	10.5	3.30
35	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	6	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.41
37	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	12	.750	1	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	13.5	3.88
40	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	14	.357	8	1	1	0.20	17	.941	1	0.20	1	1.000	12.5	3.45
42	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	13	.154	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.92
Total		76	149	1.96	67	283	.290	93	20	24	0.26	245	.902	8	0.11	11	.727	201.5	4.54

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	19	2.16	38	2	.947	17.5	5.30
6	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	13	2.35	23	1	.957	8.5	5.85
7	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	1	0.25	7	2.09	22	0	1.000	11.0	4.88
9	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	1	0.20	22	2.02	44	8	.818	9.0	2.59
11	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	8	2.44	16	0	1.000	9.5	6.30
12	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	13	2.17	23	2	.913	16.0	7.58
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	6	1.93	14	2	.857	10.0	4.57
16	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	10	2.04	23	1	.957	10.0	4.38
19	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	13	2.00	26	3	.885	5.5	2.70
20	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	4	0.80	11	2.00	23	3	.870	13.5	4.28
22	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	9	2.22	18	0	1.000	11.0	6.45
24	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	17	2.50	24	1	.958	8.0	4.37
26	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	7	2.33	12	0	1.000	5.0	4.75
28	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	10	2.19	21	1	.952	7.0	3.81
30	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	9	1.80	20	5	.750	5.5	3.05
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	15	2.00	34	3	.912	10.5	3.30
35	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	13	2.36	22	1	.955	10.0	5.41
37	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	15	2.11	36	2	.944	13.5	3.88
40	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	17	1.84	38	6	.842	12.5	3.45
42	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	3	0.75	16	2.26	27	3	.889	8.0	3.92
Total		76	4	57	61	6	0.80	43	0.57	250	2.12	504	44	.913	201.5	4.54