Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	3	3	0	1.00	8	1.000	22	7.33	59	.373	7.0	3.22
6	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	32	10.67	70	.457	1.0	5.51
7	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	1	1	3	0.33	8	.625	28	9.33	64	.438	1.0	3.24
11	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	1	2	0.33	11	.818	30	10.00	64	.469	2.0	4.00
15	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	9	4	3	1.33	17	.824	30	10.00	65	.462	7.0	6.84
18	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	9	2	1	0.67	16	.938	33	11.00	66	.500	4.5	6.47
21	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	2	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	26	8.67	59	.441	1.0	2.96
32	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	27	9.00	58	.466	2.0	4.04
Total		24	11	0.46	1	27	.370	32	12	10	0.50	92	.891	228	9.50	505	.451	25.5	4.54

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.22
6	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.51
7	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.24
11	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.00
15	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.84
18	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.47
21	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.96
32	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.04
Total		24	0	5	5	2	0.21	16	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	25.5	4.54