Players

Christophe N'Gapeth Senior Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	14	14	11	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	7	10	-.500	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.00
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	7	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.15
5	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	0	16	.500	0	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.66
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	3	12	.167	3	2	2	0.40	14	.857	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.08
8	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	4	14	.071	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.99
10	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	0	13	.615	10	1	1	0.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.34
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	11	.000	1	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.14
13	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	9.04
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	8	2	1	0.67	14	.929	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.49
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	10	.600	7	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.72
23	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	0	10	.800	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.50
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	11	.455	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.86
27	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	1	19	.579	3	1	0	0.20	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.72
29	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	6	.333	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.62
32	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	23	.478	8	2	4	0.50	16	.750	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.73
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	11	.455	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.66
35	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	12	.500	0	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.57
39	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	17	.765	2	1	0	0.33	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.60
44	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	18	.222	2	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.00
45	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	16	.063	4	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.12
Total		73	130	1.78	33	253	.383	82	14	27	0.19	244	.889	.	.	.	.	164.0	5.30

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.00
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.15
5	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.66
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.08
8	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	2	0.80	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.99
10	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.34
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.14
13	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	9.04
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.49
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.72
23	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.50
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.86
27	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.72
29	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.62
32	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.73
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.66
35	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.57
39	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.60
44	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.00
45	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.12
Total		73	5	30	35	6	0.48	62	0.85	.	.	.	.	.	164.0	5.30