Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	8	.625	0.0	1.80
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	1.80
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.33	12	.750	3	1.00	11	.273	1.0	3.15
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	4.30
Total		14	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.07	12	.750	12	0.86	26	.462	1.0	2.76

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	15	1.68	40	7	.825	0.0	1.80
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	1.69	26	5	.808	0.0	1.80
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	1.92	26	5	.808	1.0	3.15
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.05	22	3	.864	0.0	4.30
Total		14	.	.	.	.	.	11	0.79	45	1.81	114	20	.825	1.0	2.76