Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	1.70
2	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	5	.400	0.0	2.05
6	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	14	.429	0.0	4.10
9	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	3.95
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	4.13
15	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	4	0.40	19	.789	2	0.40	5	.400	2.0	3.40
18	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	4.13
21	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	4	1.00	5	.800	0.0	4.75
25	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	1.60
29	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	0	0.00	4	.000	0.0	5.60
35	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	.273	0.0	2.70
Total		41	.	.	.	.	.	16	2	14	0.05	44	.682	30	0.73	70	.429	2.0	3.46

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	1.61	18	4	.778	0.0	1.70
2	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	11	1.64	36	9	.750	0.0	2.05
6	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	10	1.64	36	8	.778	0.0	4.10
9	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	1.92	24	4	.833	0.0	3.95
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	1.79	24	5	.792	0.0	4.13
15	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	17	2.06	34	5	.853	2.0	3.40
18	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	1.79	19	3	.842	0.0	4.13
21	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	12	1.84	31	5	.839	0.0	4.75
25	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	1.60	20	5	.750	0.0	1.60
29	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	14	2.03	32	6	.813	0.0	5.60
35	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	1.75	12	3	.750	0.0	2.70
Total		41	.	.	.	.	.	58	1.41	110	1.80	286	57	.801	2.0	3.46