Players

Costanzo Schiavone Senior Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	15	15	6	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	10	.600	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.68
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	8	.875	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.45
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	6	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.00
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	8	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.77
11	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	23	.739	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	5.64
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	7	.857	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
13	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	12	.417	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
16	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	14	.357	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.71
17	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	8	2	0	0.67	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.53
20	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	12	.917	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.55
21	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	10	.200	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.41
24	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	3	23	.565	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.21
26	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.60
28	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	15	.600	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.71
29	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	14	.857	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.80
32	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	0	17	.882	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.68
35	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	12	.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
37	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	2	20	.700	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.29
39	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	15	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.98
40	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	17	.353	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
44	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	16	.625	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.72
45	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	5	-.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.32
Total		81	207	2.56	40	283	.590	12	2	3	0.02	35	.914	.	.	.	.	249.5	6.21

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.68
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.45
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.00
6	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.77
11	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	5.64
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
13	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
16	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.71
17	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.53
20	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.55
21	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.41
24	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.21
26	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.60
28	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.71
29	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.80
32	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	9	9	0	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.68
35	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
37	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.29
39	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.98
40	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
44	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.72
45	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.32
Total		81	5	71	76	6	0.94	3	0.04	.	.	.	.	.	249.5	6.21