Players

Bryer Best 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	13	12	13	13

Season 3 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
743 13th	31 163rd	34 5th	80 106th	42 94th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	29	9.67	56	.518	3.5	5.51
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	6	1	3	0.33	13	.769	31	10.33	77	.403	4.5	7.12
6	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	7	.143	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	25	8.33	68	.368	3.0	4.39
7	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	11	2	1	0.67	17	.941	33	11.00	67	.493	5.0	7.10
9	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	36	12.00	68	.529	3.0	8.03
10	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	11	3	2	1.00	19	.895	25	8.33	60	.417	4.5	4.97
13	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	12	3	2	1.00	21	.905	28	9.33	49	.571	6.0	6.37
14	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	9	.222	8	0	4	0.00	21	.810	46	11.50	98	.469	3.5	7.36
17	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	5	1	1.67	12	.917	20	6.67	41	.488	6.0	3.45
19	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	12	2	1	0.67	18	.944	32	10.67	56	.571	4.0	6.79
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	2	2	0.67	21	.905	28	9.33	52	.538	4.0	6.67
23	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	7	-.143	9	4	2	0.80	23	.913	49	9.80	110	.445	4.0	4.39
24	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	37	12.33	87	.425	1.0	6.96
26	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	7	.429	5	1	1	0.25	16	.938	36	9.00	79	.456	5.5	5.60
28	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	6	.167	8	3	7	0.75	19	.632	44	11.00	88	.500	5.5	6.20
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	9	-.111	5	1	1	0.20	18	.944	50	10.00	107	.467	1.5	4.26
32	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	8	.250	13	3	4	0.75	24	.833	48	12.00	100	.480	7.5	8.02
33	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	21	7.00	53	.396	2.5	3.04
35	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	10	.000	4	0	3	0.00	15	.800	40	10.00	90	.444	3.0	5.32
36	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	9	.000	4	1	3	0.25	15	.800	43	10.75	102	.422	5.0	6.18
37	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	6	2	1	0.50	17	.941	42	10.50	91	.462	5.0	6.40
Total		74	31	0.42	13	110	.164	146	34	47	0.46	343	.863	743	10.04	1599	.465	87.5	5.91

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.51
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.12
6	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.39
7	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.10
9	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.03
10	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.97
13	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.37
14	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.36
17	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.45
19	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.79
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.67
23	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.39
24	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.96
26	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.60
28	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.20
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.26
32	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	8.02
33	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.04
35	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.32
36	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.18
37	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.40
Total		74	3	39	42	4	0.57	80	1.08	.	.	.	.	.	87.5	5.91