Players

Rudiger Sachse Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	14	9	14	8	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	8	22	.000	5	1	3	0.20	12	.750	1	0.20	2	.500	11.0	3.97
3	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	24	.375	4	2	3	0.40	14	.786	.	.	.	.	15.0	3.87
4	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	24	.292	2	1	3	0.25	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	5.55
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	21	.381	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.35
7	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	31	.387	6	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.64
9	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	7	26	.115	3	0	4	0.00	13	.692	0	0.00	2	.000	11.5	4.32
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	15	.200	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.33
12	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	28	.357	9	2	2	0.40	20	.900	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.80
14	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	7	23	.217	2	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	4.68
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	16	.438	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.5	7.66
19	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	10	.500	7	2	3	0.50	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	3.57
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	11	.455	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.0	3.91
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	19	.368	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	2	0.67	3	.667	10.0	5.98
31	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	18	.278	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	6.00
33	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	8	21	.000	6	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.68
36	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	23	.435	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.45
41	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	9	33	.121	7	1	1	0.25	17	.941	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.83
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	24	.542	14	1	3	0.20	27	.889	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.21
Total		73	192	2.63	79	389	.290	80	12	40	0.16	237	.831	5	0.07	12	.417	226.0	5.43

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	9	1.80	19	2.03	40	4	.900	11.0	3.97
3	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	8	1.79	29	4	.862	15.0	3.87
4	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	12	2.20	25	1	.960	13.0	5.55
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	12	2.07	27	0	1.000	11.0	6.35
7	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	18	2.33	30	0	1.000	17.5	7.64
9	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	18	2.34	32	2	.938	11.5	4.32
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	2	0.50	14	1.96	28	5	.821	4.5	2.33
12	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	6	1.20	22	2.23	39	2	.949	18.5	6.80
14	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	11	11	0	2.20	7	1.40	15	1.86	36	5	.861	17.5	4.68
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	10	2.27	22	1	.955	11.5	7.66
19	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	16	2.00	37	5	.865	9.5	3.57
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	10	2.12	25	2	.920	7.0	3.91
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.19	31	0	1.000	10.0	5.98
31	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	13	2.00	26	4	.846	11.0	6.00
33	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	18	2.19	36	2	.944	9.0	3.68
36	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	7	2.23	13	0	1.000	14.5	7.45
41	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	9	2.29	17	0	1.000	16.0	7.83
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	20	2.00	44	6	.864	18.0	6.21
Total		73	1	42	43	4	0.59	78	1.07	255	2.10	537	43	.920	226.0	5.43