Players

Ian Larkin Senior Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	-	13	14	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	6	15	.067	11	3	1	0.60	23	.957	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.92
3	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	15	.267	9	2	4	0.40	23	.826	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.47
4	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	15	.133	2	1	3	0.25	11	.727	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.20
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	14	.000	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.54
7	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	9	.222	6	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.50
9	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	3	11	.182	6	4	1	0.80	17	.941	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.95
11	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	17	.176	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.87
13	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.67
14	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	15	.467	8	2	1	0.40	19	.947	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.11
18	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.31
22	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	12	-.167	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.08
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.95
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	14	.571	8	1	3	0.33	15	.800	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.68
33	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	15	.333	3	1	0	0.20	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.84
34	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	0	14	.857	10	2	2	0.40	22	.909	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.56
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	16	.313	6	0	5	0.00	17	.706	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.23
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	11	.545	2	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.66
Total		68	118	1.74	52	217	.304	81	19	31	0.28	248	.875	.	.	.	.	165.0	5.44

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	2	4	6	0	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.92
3	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.47
4	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.20
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.54
7	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.50
9	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.95
11	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.87
13	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.67
14	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	2	1.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.11
18	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.31
22	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.08
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.95
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.68
33	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.84
34	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.56
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.23
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.66
Total		68	6	44	50	4	0.74	24	0.35	.	.	.	.	.	165.0	5.44