Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	6	3	1	1.00	15	.933	21	7.00	63	.333	3.5	3.64
5	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	5	1	2	0.33	14	.857	32	10.67	82	.390	2.0	5.30
7	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	31	10.33	62	.500	0.5	4.90
11	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	1	1	0.25	16	.938	39	9.75	93	.419	2.0	4.64
12	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	35	11.67	64	.547	0.0	4.92
15	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	5	.400	5	1	2	0.20	17	.882	48	9.60	112	.429	5.0	5.79
17	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	14	.929	38	12.67	52	.731	4.0	8.89
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	3	1	2	0.33	11	.818	29	9.67	59	.492	2.0	4.06
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	8	.375	0	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	26	8.67	57	.456	3.5	4.48
34	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	26	8.67	60	.433	3.5	4.60
Total		33	9	0.27	2	37	.189	35	8	15	0.24	123	.878	325	9.85	704	.462	26.0	5.12

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.64
5	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.30
7	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	4.90
11	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.64
12	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	4.92
15	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.79
17	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.89
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.06
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.48
34	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.60
Total		33	1	16	17	3	0.52	28	0.85	.	.	.	.	.	26.0	5.12