Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 23 hours and 35 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Tuesday, April 28th, 2026 - 06:24:34 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Mark Magee Senior Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	14	12	-

Season 14 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
41 301st	.028 385th	11 214th	38 274th	12 370th

Career Honors

S161st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	3	13	-.077	5	2	3	0.50	15	.800	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.97
4	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	13	-.077	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.14
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	10	.100	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.00
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	14	-.214	3	2	2	0.67	9	.778	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.50
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	11	-.182	5	3	1	1.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.83
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	4	12	.000	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.92
21	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	10	.300	2	2	1	0.67	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.80
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	13	.308	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.20
35	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	11	.273	3	2	3	0.67	9	.667	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.06
40	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.55
45	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	10	24	-.167	9	0	1	0.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.62
Total		37	41	1.11	37	141	.028	38	11	18	0.30	117	.846	.	.	.	.	59.0	4.14

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.97
4	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.14
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.00
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.50
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.83
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.92
21	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	1	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.80
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.20
35	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.06
40	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.55
45	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.62
Total		37	2	10	12	2	0.32	38	1.03	.	.	.	.	.	59.0	4.14