Players

Bjorn van Gelder Junior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	15	17	15	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	29	.207	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.13
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	11	-.091	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.89
5	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	8	42	.167	7	2	1	0.50	15	.933	.	.	.	.	19.5	6.84
7	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	16	.250	5	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.05
8	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	9	29	.034	4	1	1	0.20	13	.923	.	.	.	.	12.0	3.81
10	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	5	20	.200	5	2	1	0.50	13	.923	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.61
13	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	19	.263	3	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.49
15	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	8	19	-.158	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.96
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	8	33	.333	10	1	2	0.20	19	.895	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.74
18	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	27	.407	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.40
21	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	8	37	.270	8	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.23
25	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	25	.360	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.44
26	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	21	.286	5	0	3	0.00	15	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	4.14
29	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	18	.333	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.52
34	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	25	.320	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	0	0.00	2	.000	15.0	5.75
Total		61	165	2.70	81	371	.226	70	9	22	0.15	194	.887	0	0.00	3	.000	189.5	5.20

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	1.68	19	2	.895	10.0	4.13
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	6	2.15	13	0	1.000	5.0	3.89
5	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	11	1.77	35	5	.857	19.5	6.84
7	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	17	2.00	40	6	.850	8.5	3.05
8	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	5	1.00	18	2.10	41	5	.878	12.0	3.81
10	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	3	0.75	15	2.06	34	2	.941	12.0	4.61
13	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	9	2.09	23	1	.957	9.5	4.49
15	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	1.89	18	2	.889	5.0	1.96
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	7	1.40	14	2.42	24	1	.958	22.5	8.74
18	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	10	2.50	14	2.21	29	1	.966	15.0	7.40
21	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	11	1.80	30	5	.833	21.5	7.23
25	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	15	1.91	32	6	.813	12.5	5.44
26	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	9	1.80	10	2.07	29	2	.931	10.5	4.14
29	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	15	2.30	23	1	.957	11.0	6.52
34	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	14	2.25	28	1	.964	15.0	5.75
Total		61	1	29	30	5	0.49	67	1.10	181	2.04	418	40	.904	189.5	5.20