Players

Jordyn Ortiz 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	11	12	13	12	1

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	10	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.67
2	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	9	34	.029	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.69
3	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	16	.313	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.41
4	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	7	30	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.37
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	6	24	-.042	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.64
7	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.85
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	14	.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.10
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	5	16	-.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.75
12	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	23	.087	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.04
13	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	7	21	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	2.53
16	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	5	25	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.46
17	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	11	41	.024	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.26
18	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	20	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.51
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	19	.158	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.71
23	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	22	.136	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.15
26	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	12	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.95
33	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	5	23	.174	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.87
34	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	20	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.06
Total		68	128	1.88	82	379	.121	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	162.0	4.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	NA	NA	14	0	1.000	4.0	4.67
2	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	NA	NA	21	3	.857	11.0	5.69
3	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	23	6	.739	7.0	3.41
4	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	NA	NA	29	3	.897	9.0	3.37
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	5	1.25	NA	NA	40	5	.875	7.5	2.64
7	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	NA	NA	18	3	.833	9.0	4.85
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	NA	NA	30	8	.733	6.0	2.10
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	NA	NA	33	5	.848	4.5	2.75
12	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	21	5	.762	8.0	4.04
13	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	5	1.00	NA	NA	33	5	.848	8.0	2.53
16	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	13	2.60	NA	NA	29	2	.931	7.5	4.46
17	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	11	2.75	NA	NA	24	4	.833	14.5	6.26
18	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	NA	NA	32	1	.969	12.0	5.51
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	NA	NA	28	3	.893	7.0	2.71
23	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	8	1.60	NA	NA	29	3	.897	12.0	4.15
26	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	NA	NA	21	2	.905	11.0	5.95
33	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	14	3.50	NA	NA	19	4	.789	12.5	4.87
34	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	9	3.00	NA	NA	31	4	.871	11.5	6.06
Total		68	2	32	34	6	0.50	125	1.84	0	0.00	475	66	.861	162.0	4.22