Players

Barrett Simmons Junior Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	15	-	-	16	11

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	5.63
5	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	9	.556	0.0	6.98
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	.111	0.0	6.10
7	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	7	.143	0.0	3.80
9	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	6	.333	0.0	5.65
11	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	4.75
13	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.40
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	5	.400	0.0	5.65
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.75
19	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	1	1.000	0.0	3.35
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.95
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	4.45
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	4.75
33	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	6	.167	0.0	4.70
34	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	9	.444	0.0	6.25
38	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	.818	0.0	5.99
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	10	.900	0.0	3.78
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	9	.778	0.0	4.60
Total		72	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	57	0.79	110	.518	0.0	5.09

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	1.71	14	4	.714	0.0	5.63
5	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	15	2.23	26	2	.923	0.0	6.98
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.62	13	1	.923	0.0	6.10
7	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	9	2.10	20	1	.950	0.0	3.80
9	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	10	2.24	17	1	.941	0.0	5.65
11	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.21	14	1	.929	0.0	4.75
13	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.00	22	2	.909	0.0	4.40
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	21	2.14	42	4	.905	0.0	5.65
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.29	14	1	.929	0.0	5.75
19	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	15	2.27	26	1	.962	0.0	3.35
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	2.23	22	3	.864	0.0	4.95
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	2.08	24	4	.833	0.0	4.45
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.36	25	1	.960	0.0	4.75
33	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	21	2.16	43	2	.953	0.0	4.70
34	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	17	2.32	31	1	.968	0.0	6.25
38	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	16	2.10	30	2	.933	0.0	5.99
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	16	2.29	31	0	1.000	0.0	3.78
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	10	1.75	28	5	.821	0.0	4.60
Total		72	.	.	.	.	.	117	1.63	229	2.17	442	36	.919	0.0	5.09