Players

Felix van der Horst Junior Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	-	-	14	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	3	0.20	18	.833	4	0.80	10	.400	1.0	6.88
6	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	1	0.33	7	.143	0.0	3.05
7	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	6	.667	0.0	6.93
8	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	.455	0.0	5.45
10	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.85
11	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	4.18
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	4.52
14	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	10	.600	0.0	3.71
18	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	14	.357	0.0	5.90
19	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	8	.500	0.0	4.73
22	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	6.25
23	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	3	.667	0.0	3.90
25	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	4	.750	0.0	3.95
26	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	5.85
31	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	4.55
33	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	5.85
36	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	5.50
38	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	16	.625	0.0	6.01
41	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	6.25
43	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	9	.556	0.0	3.65
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	.750	0.0	6.03
Total		82	.	.	.	.	.	11	1	3	0.01	26	.885	81	0.99	151	.536	1.0	5.14

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	23	2.35	37	3	.919	1.0	6.88
6	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	2.00	16	3	.813	0.0	3.05
7	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	17	2.15	33	2	.939	0.0	6.93
8	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	12	2.04	26	2	.923	0.0	5.45
10	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	15	2.22	27	2	.926	0.0	4.85
11	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	14	2.35	23	3	.870	0.0	4.18
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.33	15	1	.933	0.0	4.52
14	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	15	2.16	32	3	.906	0.0	3.71
18	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	10	2.08	24	2	.917	0.0	5.90
19	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	14	2.39	23	1	.957	0.0	4.73
22	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	21	2.32	37	1	.973	0.0	6.25
23	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	18	2.28	32	1	.969	0.0	3.90
25	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	17	2.03	39	5	.872	0.0	3.95
26	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	19	2.27	30	3	.900	0.0	5.85
31	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	14	2.29	28	2	.929	0.0	4.55
33	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	13	2.17	23	1	.957	0.0	5.85
36	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.22	27	2	.926	0.0	5.50
38	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	15	2.19	31	3	.903	0.0	6.01
41	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	19	2.18	34	5	.853	0.0	6.25
43	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	12	2.14	22	3	.864	0.0	3.65
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.07	30	3	.900	0.0	6.03
Total		82	.	.	.	.	.	136	1.66	310	2.20	589	51	.913	1.0	5.14